Can an applicator be sued for applying pesticides to the incorrect target site, even without causing damage?

The assertion that an applicator can be sued for applying pesticides to the incorrect target site, regardless of whether there was damage, is correct because it relates to liability and regulatory compliance in the use of pesticides.

Pesticide application is strictly regulated by laws that require applicators to follow specific guidelines regarding where and how pesticides can be used. Even if no damage occurs, applying pesticides to the wrong site can violate these regulations, which are in place to protect public health, the environment, and non-target organisms. Regulatory agencies may impose penalties, and individuals can be held liable for non-compliance with these legal standards. This accountability exists to ensure that applicators act responsibly and adhere to best practices within the industry.

The other options suggest that damage or the nature of the mistake (honest or negligent) would mitigate liability, but regulatory frameworks typically impose strict liability standards. This means that the act of non-compliance itself can result in legal action, independent of the consequences of the mistake.